Last update on .

Firefox vs Chrome
Firefox vs Chrome

Google chrome was introduced In 2008, and its impact as an innovation in browser technology was immediate seen on by it's competitors. The truth is chrome was faster for loading sites, took up minimal screen space and offered an undeniably simple user interface.

Google chrome was introduced In 2008,  and its impact as an innovation in browser technology was immediate seen on by it's competitors. The truth is chrome  was faster for loading sites, took up minimal screen space and offered an undeniably simple user interface.

Fast-forward in today's competition, the competitive landscape for browsers has changed with many people beginning to question just what is happening to their online data such as browsing history, passwords, and other sensitive information. There is a  lot that has changed since 2008 when Chrome came onto the scene. But at Firefox, we’ve been heads down, working to redesign our interface and provide users with an ever growing number of privacy and performance enhancements as well as plenty of handy browser tools.

And so here we are again with  the browser-wars still escalating once again and it’s time to reevaluate and compare Firefox Browser vs Google Chrome. We have got back in time when browser wars were fought others lost and own and merged from the rubbles.

Security and Privacy in both Firefox and Chrome

We shall begin by examining the most important aspect in this internet of things as more and more people are concerned about privacy and as we see privacy policies emerge

Security and Privacy Firefox Chrome
Private Browsing mode Yes Yes
Blocks third-party tracking cookies Yes No
Blocks cryptomining scripts Yes No
Blocks social trackers Yes No

As you can see there is a problem with Google chromes' way of handling third-party tracking cookies, probably because google it self likes the tracking part. Another important aspect in these crypto world is the emergence of Cryptomining scripts. If you here you computer making humming noise that it used not to make before, they bef worried there could be a cryptomining script running in your browser consuming valuble resources.

Firefox, has a  huge number of dedicated users who appreciate there steadfast dedication to online privacy. For example, the latest version of Firefox includes a feature called Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) which is turned on by default for all users worldwide. ETP blocks over 2,000 trackers, including social trackers from companies like Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. It also has an integrated feature called Firefox Monitor that automatically notifies you if your password has been breached or needs to be updated. In addition to these protections, Firefox's Private Browsing mode automatically deletes your browsing information such as history and cookies, leaving no trace after you finish your session.

Firefox has also recently restated there commitment to privacy and transparency regarding user data in there most recent Privacy Notice that states, “At Mozilla, they believe that privacy is fundamental to a healthy internet.”

Google Chrome is by all accounts a secure browser, with features like Google Safe Browsing, which helps protect users by displaying an impossible-to-miss warning when they attempt to navigate to dangerous sites or download dangerous files.

Well as for now, both Chrome and Firefox have rigorous security measure in place. Both browsers include a thing called “sandboxing” which separates the processes of the browser so something like a harmful website doesn’t infect other parts of your laptop or other device.

While Chrome proves to be a safe web browser, its privacy record is questionable. Google actually collects a disturbingly large amount of data from its users including location, search history and site visits, this may explain why they may be not blocking thirdparty tracking scripts because they themselves are involved in the tracking bussiness. Google makes its case for data collection saying it’s doing it to improve its services – like helping you find a sweater or a coffee shop like the one you previously bought or visited. However, others might disagree, making the point that Google is actually gathering an unprecedented amount of data for its own marketing purposes. They tout that they’re keeping your information private from hackers, but that’s beside the point. Google itself runs the world’s largest advertising network, thanks in large part to data they harvest from their users.

Ultimately, it’s up to you to decide whether or not or where to draw the line with sharing things like your search history and shopping history. But if you’re anything like most people, you’ve probably searched for some things on the internet that you would rather keep private.

Comparison of Utility in both Firefox and Chrome

Utility Firefox Chrome
Autoplay blocking Yes Yes
Tab browsing Yes Yes
Bookmark manager Yes Yes
Automatically fills out forms Yes Yes
Search engine options Yes Yes
Text to speech Yes Yes
Reader mode Yes Yes
Spell checking Yes Yes
Web extensions/Add-ons Yes Yes
In-browser screenshot tool Yes No


In terms of features, it so happens that  both Firefox and Chrome offer a large library of extensions and plug-ins or addons, but Chrome’s catalog vastly outnumbering any other browser while nicely integrating with other Google services, like Gmail and Google Docs, this gives chrome an upper hand.

Although not as extensive as Chrome’s add-on library, Firefox, as open-source software with a huge number of active contributors, also features an incredible number of useful extensions.

Firefox also has a sync feature to see your open and recent tabs, browsing history, and bookmarks across all your devices.

While Chrome gets the nod with add-ons and extensions, Firefox has a nicely curated set of built-in features, such as the incredibly handy screen capture tool, and reading mode feature which strips away everything from the page except the text from the article you’re reading.

If having tons of open tabs is your thing, then it really comes down to your UI preference. Firefox features a horizontal scroll on all your open tabs rather than shrinking them smaller and smaller with each new one. Google Chrome prefers to shrink them down so just the favicon is visible. The only problem with this is when you have multiple tabs open from the same website, so you see the same favicon across your tabs.

As for customization, our fans will tell you one of the things they love most about our browser is its ability to allow you to move and arrange a majority of the UI elements to best suit your needs. Chrome allows you to hide certain UI elements but there’s not much allowance, if any, for moving things around based on your preferences. However, it should be noted that both Chrome and Firefox make it pretty easy to change your browser’s appearance and theme. As for customization I think firefox has an upper hand, and firefox has easy of accessibility for settings, unlike chrome, that might puzzle even the most experience computer user.


Comparison of Portability for both Firefox and Chrome

Portability Firefox Chrome
OS availability Yes Yes
Mobile OS availability Yes Yes
Syncs with mobile Yes Yes
Password management Yes Yes
Master Password Yes Yes

Almost needless to say, versions of both Firefox and Chrome are available for the most popular desktop and mobile operating systems (Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, iOS).

Both browsers that is Chrome and Firefox also allow you to sync things like passwords, bookmarks, and open tabs across all your devices. If you have a Firefox account, you can manually send an open tab on your desktop to your mobile device or vice versa. With Chrome, it’s done automatically if you’ve chosen that setting in your preferences. Not having to manually send the tab from one device to the other is convenient when you want to do something like continue reading an article you didn’t finish earlier. But there could be times where automatic syncing might not be ideal if there’s a chance multiple users are browsing while signed in to your Google account.



Comments are closed.